<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Commercial Observer &#187; Nouvel/Hines to Ask Council for Their 200 Feet Back on MoMA Tower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commercialobserver.com/2009/10/nouvelhines-to-ask-council-for-their-200-feet-back-on-moma-tower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commercialobserver.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='commercialobserver.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://commercialobserver.com/osd.xml" title="The Commercial Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://commercialobserver.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Nouvel/Hines to Ask Council for Their 200 Feet Back on MoMA Tower</title>

		<comments>http://commercialobserver.com/2009/10/nouvelhines-to-ask-council-for-their-200-feet-back-on-moma-tower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:19:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://commercialobserver.com/2009/10/nouvelhines-to-ask-council-for-their-200-feet-back-on-moma-tower/</link>
			<dc:creator>Eliot Brown</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commercialobserver.com/2009/10/nouvelhines-to-ask-council-for-their-200-feet-back-on-moma-tower/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyocommercialobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/skyline-view.jpg?w=300&h=214" />The Jean Nouvel-designed skyscraper planned to rise next to MoMA goes before the City Council today for a hearing, where, according to a person informed of the decision, developer Hines Interests plans to request that its original height be restored.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The request comes after City Planning Commission chairwoman Amanda Burden <a href="/2009/real-estate/amanda-burden-chop-200-feet-nouvel%E2%80%99s-moma-tower">c</a><a href="/2009/real-estate/amanda-burden-chop-200-feet-nouvel%E2%80%99s-moma-tower">hopped 200 feet off the top of the tower</a>, which was to rise to 1,250 feet, the height of the Empire  State Building. And it&rsquo;s a bit of a reverse of the usual scenario: Typically, when developers reach the Council&mdash;the last stage in the city&rsquo;s land-use approval process&mdash;the Council members negotiate with them to make their project smaller, not bigger.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It's probably important to note that 1,250 hasn't always been its height. Back in 2008, when the project went through the Landmarks Preservation Commission, the developer <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/nyregion/09moma.html">put its planned height at 1,155 feet</a>; so before it shrunk by 200 feet, it apparently grew by 95.&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We&rsquo;ll have more from the hearing later today.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>ebrown@observer.com</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyocommercialobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/skyline-view.jpg?w=300&h=214" />The Jean Nouvel-designed skyscraper planned to rise next to MoMA goes before the City Council today for a hearing, where, according to a person informed of the decision, developer Hines Interests plans to request that its original height be restored.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The request comes after City Planning Commission chairwoman Amanda Burden <a href="/2009/real-estate/amanda-burden-chop-200-feet-nouvel%E2%80%99s-moma-tower">c</a><a href="/2009/real-estate/amanda-burden-chop-200-feet-nouvel%E2%80%99s-moma-tower">hopped 200 feet off the top of the tower</a>, which was to rise to 1,250 feet, the height of the Empire  State Building. And it&rsquo;s a bit of a reverse of the usual scenario: Typically, when developers reach the Council&mdash;the last stage in the city&rsquo;s land-use approval process&mdash;the Council members negotiate with them to make their project smaller, not bigger.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It's probably important to note that 1,250 hasn't always been its height. Back in 2008, when the project went through the Landmarks Preservation Commission, the developer <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/nyregion/09moma.html">put its planned height at 1,155 feet</a>; so before it shrunk by 200 feet, it apparently grew by 95.&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We&rsquo;ll have more from the hearing later today.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>ebrown@observer.com</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://commercialobserver.com/2009/10/nouvelhines-to-ask-council-for-their-200-feet-back-on-moma-tower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyocommercialobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/skyline-view.jpg?w=300&#38;h=214" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
